Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Ethiopia In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,868,211 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,503,517 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 85.9%, a difference of 0.40%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Carpatho Rusyn	Immigrants from Ethiopia
Minimum	72.7%	59.3%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	27.3%	40.7%
Mean	87.5%	85.5%
Median	86.0%	86.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	84.6%	84.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	89.0%	88.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	4.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.8%	7.5%

Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Immigrants from Ethiopia by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Slovene (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ireland (85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Serbia (85.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Ethiopian (85.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cameroon (85.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (86.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 86.2%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 86.2%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 86.1%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 85.4%