Alaskan Athabascan vs Aleut In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Aleut
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Aleuts
81.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Aleut In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,811,893 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014 and weighted average of 81.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,589 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Aleut |
Minimum | 33.3% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 66.7% | 66.7% |
Mean | 82.2% | 82.6% |
Median | 83.2% | 84.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.3% | 75.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.7% | 25.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.3% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.2% | 18.2% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Aleuts by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cherokee (81.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Iroquois (81.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Comanche (82.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Chippewa (82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Central America (82.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Hmong (82.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Hispanic or Latino (82.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 82.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 82.4% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 82.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 82.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 82.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 82.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 82.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.2% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |