Yuman vs Kiowa Currently Married
COMPARE
Yuman
Kiowa
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Yuman
Kiowa
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Kiowa Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,696,202 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.557 and weighted average of 42.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,101,122 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 43.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Kiowa |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 31.5% |
| Maximum | 59.4% | 61.6% |
| Range | 53.3% | 30.1% |
| Mean | 42.2% | 46.1% |
| Median | 45.5% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.2% | 42.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 52.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.0% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 7.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Kiowa by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Subsaharan African (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Apache (43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |