Syrian vs Pakistani Family Households
COMPARE
Syrian
Pakistani
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Syrians
Pakistanis
64.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Syrian vs Pakistani Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,181,919 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 64.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,180,363 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.18%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Syrian | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 29.0% | 30.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 71.0% | 69.2% |
| Mean | 68.3% | 67.3% |
| Median | 66.9% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.8% | 62.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.2% | 73.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Syrians and Pakistanis by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |