Choctaw vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Choctaw
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Choctaw
Chickasaw
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,568,825 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.56%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 89.9% | 62.8% |
Range | 83.4% | 56.3% |
Mean | 29.2% | 27.4% |
Median | 27.4% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.9% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |