Shoshone vs Guatemalan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Shoshone
Guatemalan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Shoshone
Guatemalans
43.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Guatemalan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,615,808 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241 and weighted average of 43.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,284,876 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 43.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Shoshone | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 20.5% | 11.2% |
Maximum | 74.8% | 67.5% |
Range | 54.3% | 56.3% |
Mean | 46.7% | 42.0% |
Median | 46.4% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.0% | 37.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.3% | 45.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Guatemalans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Apache (43.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Central American (43.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Ethiopian (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |