Osage vs Dominican Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Osage
Dominican
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Osage
Dominicans
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
79.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
61.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Dominican Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,912 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,685,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 0.48%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Dominican |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 14.2% |
| Maximum | 43.8% | 57.1% |
| Range | 36.9% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 29.6% |
| Median | 26.7% | 28.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.9% | 26.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 32.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Dominicans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Moldova (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Menominee (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Immigrants from South Africa (27.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (27.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
| Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |