Israeli vs Potawatomi Family Households
COMPARE
Israeli
Potawatomi
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Israelis
Potawatomi
63.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Potawatomi Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,999,520 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 63.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,902 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.28%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 46.6% | 37.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.4% | 62.9% |
| Mean | 73.6% | 66.1% |
| Median | 70.5% | 65.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.4% | 61.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.5% | 70.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Potawatomi by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Western Africa (63.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Colville (63.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (63.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Cheyenne (63.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Kenyan (63.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cypriots | 0.6 /100 | #260 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Cheyenne | 0.5 /100 | #263 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Kenyans | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Colville | 0.5 /100 | #265 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.5 /100 | #266 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Israelis | 0.4 /100 | #267 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.4 /100 | #268 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 0.4 /100 | #269 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 0.3 /100 | #270 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 0.3 /100 | #271 | Tragic 63.1% |