Immigrants vs Houma Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants
Houma
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants
Houma
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Houma Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,097,366 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.66%.
![Immigrants vs Houma Family Households](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/family-households/immigrants-vs-houma-family-households-chart.webp)
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Houma |
Minimum | 42.8% | 53.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.8% |
Range | 57.2% | 25.0% |
Mean | 68.6% | 67.7% |
Median | 67.8% | 67.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.2% | 65.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.4% | 71.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Houma by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Hong Kong (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Burmese (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |