Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Panamanian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,648,507 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,035,493 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.89%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Panamanian
Minimum	14.3%	4.6%
Maximum	45.4%	49.6%
Range	31.1%	45.0%
Mean	28.7%	24.4%
Median	28.7%	25.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.2%	17.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.2%	29.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.0%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	10.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.7%	10.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Panamanians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Jordan (28.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Nigerian (28.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nepal (28.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (28.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Liberian (28.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Laotians	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.4%
Nigerians	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.4%
Natives/Alaskans	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.4%
South Americans	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.4%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.4%
Nicaraguans	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.4%
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%