Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Nigerian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,648,507 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,387,901 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 0.050%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Sri Lanka	Nigerian
Minimum	14.3%	14.3%
Maximum	45.4%	46.4%
Range	31.1%	32.1%
Mean	28.7%	28.1%
Median	28.7%	27.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.2%	26.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.2%	30.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.0%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	5.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.7%	5.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Nigerians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Jordan (28.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (28.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (28.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Laotian (28.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Nepal (28.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (28.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Iraq (28.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and South American (28.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 28.5%
Ghanaians	99.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 28.5%
Houma	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Honduras	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 28.5%
Burmese	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 28.5%
Iraqis	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 28.5%
Laotians	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.4%
Nigerians	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.4%
Natives/Alaskans	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.4%
South Americans	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.4%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.4%
Nicaraguans	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.4%
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%