Immigrants from South America vs European Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,768,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,876,859 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 27.9%, a difference of 0.46%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South America	European
Minimum	9.2%	9.1%
Maximum	50.9%	100.0%
Range	41.7%	90.9%
Mean	28.6%	34.4%
Median	27.8%	29.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.8%	26.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.5%	38.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.8%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.9%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.9%	16.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Europeans by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Zimbabwean (27.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American Indian (27.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Pakistani (27.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (27.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 27.8%