Immigrants from Scotland vs Argentinean Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,682,115 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 30.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,462,153 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109 and weighted average of 30.0%, a difference of 1.4%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Scotland	Argentinean
Minimum	14.6%	4.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	85.4%	96.0%
Mean	47.9%	34.9%
Median	37.5%	29.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	29.6%	24.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.2%	36.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	38.6%	12.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.6%	21.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	23.3%	21.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Argentineans by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Brazilian (30.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (30.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Morocco (30.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Philippines (30.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (29.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Netherlands (29.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Ugandan (30.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Korean (30.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Argentina (30.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Netherlands	91.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	91.0 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 29.9%
Argentineans	90.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 30.0%
Ugandans	89.2 /100 \| #120	Excellent 30.1%
Koreans	88.9 /100 \| #121	Excellent 30.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	88.7 /100 \| #122	Excellent 30.1%
Syrians	88.2 /100 \| #123	Excellent 30.2%
Croatians	88.0 /100 \| #124	Excellent 30.2%
Vietnamese	87.7 /100 \| #125	Excellent 30.2%
Europeans	87.2 /100 \| #126	Excellent 30.2%
Chinese	87.1 /100 \| #127	Excellent 30.2%
Icelanders	86.0 /100 \| #128	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Spain	85.8 /100 \| #129	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	85.7 /100 \| #130	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	85.7 /100 \| #131	Excellent 30.3%
New Zealanders	85.5 /100 \| #132	Excellent 30.3%
Immigrants \| Morocco	85.2 /100 \| #133	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	85.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent 30.4%
Brazilians	84.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| Scotland	84.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent 30.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	83.9 /100 \| #137	Excellent 30.4%