Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from England Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Immigrants from England
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Immigrants from England
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
77.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from England Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,963,245 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,752,954 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.23%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 32.6% | 28.6% |
Maximum | 91.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 58.6% | 71.4% |
Mean | 65.8% | 65.6% |
Median | 66.2% | 65.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.9% | 60.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.7% | 75.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from England by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Chile (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), German (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |