Immigrants from Lebanon vs Crow Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Crow
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Crow
65.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Crow Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,130,535 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428 and weighted average of 65.3%, a difference of 0.37%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Crow |
| Minimum | 51.8% | 42.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.9% |
| Range | 48.2% | 45.0% |
| Mean | 68.9% | 69.3% |
| Median | 67.4% | 69.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.2% | 79.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Crow by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Guyana (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), American (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Hopi (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Laos (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Guyanese (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Caribbean (65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
| Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |