Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Alaskan Athabascan Average Family Size
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Alaskan Athabascan
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Alaskan Athabascans
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.27
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Alaskan Athabascan Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,454,545 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,644 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 3.27, a difference of 0.46%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 2.09 | 1.83 |
| Maximum | 4.19 | 6.79 |
| Range | 2.10 | 4.96 |
| Mean | 3.32 | 3.34 |
| Median | 3.29 | 3.21 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.19 | 2.95 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.43 | 3.50 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.24 | 0.55 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.28 | 0.82 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.28 | 0.82 |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Alaskan Athabascans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Subsaharan African (3.25, a difference of 0.0%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), and Comanche (3.25, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Colombia (3.27, a difference of 0.020%), South American Indian (3.26, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.27, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (3.26, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (3.26, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 93.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 3.27 |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 3.27 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 3.27 |
| South American Indians | 91.6 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 91.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.7 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Syria | 90.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Colombians | 89.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 88.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Laotians | 88.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 87.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Costa Ricans | 86.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |