Immigrants from England vs Central American Indian Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Central American Indian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from England
Central American Indians
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Central American Indian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,752,954 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 28.6% | 38.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 91.2% |
Range | 71.4% | 52.8% |
Mean | 65.6% | 67.5% |
Median | 65.0% | 66.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.8% | 74.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Syria (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |