Immigrants from Cuba vs Blackfeet Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Blackfeet
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Blackfeet
44.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Blackfeet Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,949,905 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 44.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,469,352 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 43.8%, a difference of 0.98%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Blackfeet |
| Minimum | 21.2% | 7.3% |
| Maximum | 67.0% | 74.0% |
| Range | 45.8% | 66.7% |
| Mean | 44.6% | 41.7% |
| Median | 44.9% | 42.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.1% | 33.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.7% | 48.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Blackfeet by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Morocco (44.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from El Salvador (44.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Armenia (44.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Yup'ik (44.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Kenya (44.1%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Yup'ik | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 44.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.1% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.1% |
| German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |