Ethiopian vs Hungarian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Hungarian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Ethiopians
Hungarians
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
77.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
74.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Hungarian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,037,255 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 485,629,585 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.070%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Hungarian |
| Minimum | 18.2% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 54.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 35.9% | 95.8% |
| Mean | 29.2% | 34.7% |
| Median | 27.6% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.0% | 23.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 40.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 21.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Hungarians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Portuguese (27.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (27.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Osage (27.6%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Comanche (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (27.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Indian (Asian) (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Portuguese (27.6%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Brazilians | 79.6 /100 | #144 | Good 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 27.7% |
| Basques | 79.5 /100 | #146 | Good 27.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
| Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
| Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
| Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
| Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
| Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
| Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
| Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
| Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |