Choctaw vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Households
COMPARE
Choctaw
Immigrants from Guatemala
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Choctaw
Immigrants from Guatemala
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Guatemala Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,627,638 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,174,620 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 65.0%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Minimum | 43.9% | 35.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.7% |
| Range | 56.1% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 66.7% | 66.6% |
| Median | 65.7% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.6% | 63.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.1% | 69.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Immigrants from Guatemala by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), European (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Alaska Native (65.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |