Chippewa vs Luxembourger Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chippewa
Luxembourger
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chippewa
Luxembourgers
42.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Luxembourger Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,326,129 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 42.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,038,346 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 44.9%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 83.6% |
| Range | 90.0% | 78.5% |
| Mean | 71.0% | 34.7% |
| Median | 75.0% | 34.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.5% | 25.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 37.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 54.5% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.9% | 16.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.7% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (43.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Denmark (29.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Syria (29.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from South Africa (29.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and Norwegian (29.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Estonians | 96.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 29.2% |
| Ukrainians | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 29.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 96.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Norwegians | 95.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lithuanians | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Swedes | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 29.6% |