Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South Africa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South Africa
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South Africa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,270,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 23.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.0% | 76.2% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 66.2% |
| Median | 67.0% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 56.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 70.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 17.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Osage (63.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |