Chickasaw vs British Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
British
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
British
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs British Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,009,478 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.0%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | British |
Minimum | 40.0% | 16.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.0% | 83.6% |
Mean | 67.1% | 66.4% |
Median | 67.0% | 67.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 59.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 74.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and British by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
Ute | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 64.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 64.3% |