Cherokee vs Osage Average Family Size
COMPARE
Cherokee
 Osage
 Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Cherokee
Osage
3.18
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.18
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Osage Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,383,050 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 3.18. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,548 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 3.18, a difference of 0.18%.
 
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Osage | 
| Minimum | 2.00 | 2.23 | 
| Maximum | 5.36 | 4.00 | 
| Range | 3.36 | 1.77 | 
| Mean | 3.30 | 3.08 | 
| Median | 3.18 | 3.14 | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.09 | 2.89 | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.40 | 3.27 | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.30 | 0.38 | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.48 | 0.39 | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.48 | 0.38 | 
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Osage by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Brazilian (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Iranian (3.18, a difference of 0.030%), Icelander (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Turkey (3.18, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Houma (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Hungarian (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (3.18, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size | 
| Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226  | Tragic 3.19  | 
| Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227  | Tragic 3.19  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228  | Tragic 3.19  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229  | Tragic 3.19  | 
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #230  | Tragic 3.19  | 
| Basques | 5.2 /100 | #231  | Tragic 3.19  | 
| Cherokee | 4.7 /100 | #232  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Brazilians | 4.5 /100 | #233  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Iranians | 4.5 /100 | #234  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 4.2 /100 | #235  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.2 /100 | #236  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 3.7 /100 | #237  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Romanians | 3.7 /100 | #238  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Houma | 3.4 /100 | #239  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Osage | 3.2 /100 | #240  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #241  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Hungarians | 3.0 /100 | #242  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245  | Tragic 3.18  | 
| Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246  | Tragic 3.17  |