Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Osage Average Family Size
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Osage
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Osage
3.17
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
1.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.18
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Osage Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,204,402 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.583 and weighted average of 3.17. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,548 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 3.18, a difference of 0.30%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Osage |
Minimum | 1.94 | 2.23 |
Maximum | 3.73 | 4.00 |
Range | 1.79 | 1.77 |
Mean | 3.00 | 3.08 |
Median | 3.07 | 3.14 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.83 | 2.89 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.19 | 3.27 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.36 | 0.38 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.37 | 0.39 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.37 | 0.38 |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Osage by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are South African (3.17, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.17, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (3.17, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (3.17, a difference of 0.030%), and Puget Sound Salish (3.17, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Houma (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Hungarian (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (3.18, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Romania | 3.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.18 |
Romanians | 3.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.18 |
Houma | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.18 |
Osage | 3.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.18 |
Hungarians | 3.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.18 |
Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.17 |
Cajuns | 2.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Belarus | 2.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.17 |
Puget Sound Salish | 1.9 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Spain | 1.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.17 |
South Africans | 1.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Hungary | 1.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.17 |
Cape Verdeans | 1.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 1.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.17 |