Apache vs Honduran Currently Married
COMPARE
Apache
Honduran
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Apache
Hondurans
43.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Honduran Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,125,444 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.488 and weighted average of 43.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,812,977 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hondurans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 42.5%, a difference of 1.7%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Honduran |
| Minimum | 16.3% | 24.4% |
| Maximum | 74.2% | 62.5% |
| Range | 57.9% | 38.1% |
| Mean | 40.0% | 40.6% |
| Median | 39.7% | 41.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.0% | 36.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 44.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Hondurans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hondurans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Subsaharan African (42.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Western Africa (42.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |