Celtic vs Latvian 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Celtic
Latvian
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Celtics
Latvians
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Latvian 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,875,705 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 98.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,726,452 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428 and weighted average of 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Latvian |
| Minimum | 95.8% | 97.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 4.2% | 2.8% |
| Mean | 99.0% | 99.5% |
| Median | 99.1% | 99.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.3% | 99.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 0.66% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.66% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Latvians by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Estonian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Australian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Pueblo (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Chippewa (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Italian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Native Hawaiian (98.4%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Lumbee | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Ottawa | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Celtics | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Estonians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Australians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Pueblo | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 98.3% |