Arapaho vs Latvian 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Arapaho
Latvian
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Arapaho
Latvians
98.5%
2ND GRADE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Latvian 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,780,295 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 98.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,726,452 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428 and weighted average of 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho | Latvian |
| Minimum | 96.2% | 97.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 3.8% | 2.8% |
| Mean | 99.3% | 99.5% |
| Median | 100.0% | 99.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.7% | 99.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 0.66% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.66% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Latvians by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Croatian (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), French (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Welsh (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), European (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Czech (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Chippewa (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Italian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Native Hawaiian (98.4%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| French | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 98.4% |