Celtic vs Chinese 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Celtic
 Chinese
 2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Celtics
Chinese
98.4%
2ND GRADE
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.5%
2ND GRADE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Chinese 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,875,705 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 98.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,307 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%.
 
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Chinese | 
| Minimum | 95.8% | 96.4% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 4.2% | 3.6% | 
| Mean | 99.0% | 98.9% | 
| Median | 99.1% | 99.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.3% | 98.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 99.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 0.86% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 0.85% | 
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Chinese by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Estonian (98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Czechoslovakian (98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Hungarian (98.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Swiss (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), French Canadian (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Czech (98.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| British | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 98.5%  | 
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Lumbee | 99.9 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Ottawa | 99.9 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Celtics | 99.8 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.8 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 98.4%  | 
| Estonians | 99.8 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 98.4%  |