Zimbabwean vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Carpatho Rusyn
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Carpatho Rusyns
21.5%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,127,978 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 21.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,867,646 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.910 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 0.080%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 8.6% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 44.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 35.4% | 94.4% |
Mean | 21.4% | 22.3% |
Median | 20.5% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Carpatho Rusyns by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Pakistan (21.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Egyptian (21.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Asia (21.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Denmark (21.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Egyptian (21.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (21.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (21.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Asia (21.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 21.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 21.4% |
Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.5 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.5 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Zimbabweans | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 21.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Egyptians | 99.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Maltese | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 21.6% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 21.7% |
Chinese | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 21.7% |