Yuman vs Zimbabwean Disability Age 18 to 34
COMPARE
Yuman
Zimbabwean
Disability Age 18 to 34
Disability Age 18 to 34 Comparison
Yuman
Zimbabweans
10.6%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Zimbabwean Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,657,868 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,205,291 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 63.0%.
Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 0.28% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.0% | 99.7% |
| Mean | 22.7% | 8.7% |
| Median | 16.3% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.2% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.8% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.3% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 18 to 34
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Houma (9.7%, a difference of 8.9%), Alaskan Athabascan (9.4%, a difference of 11.8%), Creek (9.0%, a difference of 17.1%), Chippewa (9.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and Yakama (9.0%, a difference of 17.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 9.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 9.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (6.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (6.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Dominican (6.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Inupiat (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
| Tongans | 81.9 /100 | #151 | Excellent 6.4% |
| Bulgarians | 78.3 /100 | #152 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 76.8 /100 | #154 | Good 6.5% |
| Inupiat | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 75.3 /100 | #156 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 75.0 /100 | #157 | Good 6.5% |
| Zimbabweans | 74.7 /100 | #158 | Good 6.5% |
| Dominicans | 73.6 /100 | #159 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 72.5 /100 | #160 | Good 6.5% |
| Arabs | 72.3 /100 | #161 | Good 6.5% |
| South Africans | 71.7 /100 | #162 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 71.7 /100 | #163 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 70.4 /100 | #164 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 69.6 /100 | #165 | Good 6.5% |