Yuman vs Tlingit-Haida Vision Disability
COMPARE
Yuman
 Tlingit-Haida
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Yuman
Tlingit-Haida
3.0%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yuman vs Tlingit-Haida Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,661,627 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,836,708 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 4.6%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yuman | Tlingit-Haida | 
| Minimum | 0.83% | 1.4% | 
| Maximum | 20.5% | 7.5% | 
| Range | 19.7% | 6.1% | 
| Mean | 4.7% | 4.0% | 
| Median | 3.0% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 5.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 1.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Yuman and Tlingit-Haida by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Apache (3.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Spanish American (2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Colville (3.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Paiute (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Comanche (2.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), Cherokee (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and Black/African American (2.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |