Welsh vs Lebanese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Welsh
Lebanese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Welsh
Lebanese
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Lebanese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,521,772 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,594,018 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.050%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Lebanese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 4.9% |
| Maximum | 48.8% | 68.2% |
| Range | 47.7% | 63.4% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 17.2% |
| Median | 15.7% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Lebanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Norway (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), French (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Aleut (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (17.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (17.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (17.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Germany (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% |
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 17.0% |