Venezuelan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vision Disability
COMPARE
Venezuelan
 Immigrants from Zimbabwe
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Venezuelans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Venezuelan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,200,633 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.66%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Venezuelan | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 
| Minimum | 0.36% | 0.59% | 
| Maximum | 6.0% | 6.8% | 
| Range | 5.6% | 6.2% | 
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% | 
| Median | 2.0% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.73% | 0.89% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.94% | 1.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.94% | 1.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Venezuelans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Vietnamese (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136  | Excellent 2.1%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137  | Excellent 2.1%  |