Turkish vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Turkish
Zimbabwean
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Turks
Zimbabweans
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,457,776 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,074,589 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 25.2% |
| Range | 22.8% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 10.0% |
| Median | 9.3% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Zimbabweans by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Bhutanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Poland (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (11.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Asia (11.6%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (11.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.6%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |