Turkish vs Salvadoran Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
 Salvadoran
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Turks
Salvadorans
10.7%
DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Salvadoran Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,857,414 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,952,177 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.495 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Salvadoran | 
| Minimum | 4.7% | 4.0% | 
| Maximum | 24.3% | 16.3% | 
| Range | 19.6% | 12.3% | 
| Mean | 11.9% | 9.9% | 
| Median | 10.6% | 10.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 8.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 11.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 2.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Turks and Salvadorans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Afghan (10.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Cambodian (10.8%, a difference of 0.54%), Mongolian (10.8%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Australia (10.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Nepal (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Lithuania (10.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Spain (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Jordanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and South American (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Vietnamese | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |