Taiwanese vs Peruvian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Peruvian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Taiwanese
Peruvians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Peruvian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,722,995 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,114,873 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.579 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Taiwanese | Peruvian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 24.7% |
Range | 11.0% | 22.5% |
Mean | 5.7% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Peruvians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.46%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |