Spanish American Indian vs Japanese Male Disability
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Japanese
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Japanese
11.6%
MALE DISABILITY
10.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
MALE DISABILITY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Japanese Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,149,525 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,159,975 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Japanese |
Minimum | 5.0% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 36.5% | 26.9% |
Range | 31.5% | 20.2% |
Mean | 13.7% | 14.5% |
Median | 11.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Japanese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Icelander (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Somalia (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Ukrainian (11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ute (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Thailand (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Liberian (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (11.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Congo (11.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Ukrainians | 10.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 10.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.5% |
Icelanders | 10.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 10.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.6% |
Ute | 9.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 11.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 11.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 8.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 11.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 7.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 11.6% |
Lithuanians | 6.6 /100 | #214 | Tragic 11.6% |
Indonesians | 5.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 11.6% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 4.9 /100 | #216 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 4.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | England | 4.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 11.7% |
Panamanians | 3.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 3.8 /100 | #220 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 11.7% |
Alsatians | 3.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 11.7% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 3.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.7% |
Japanese | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.7% |
Liberians | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.8% |