Romanian vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Immigrants from Guatemala
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Romanians
Immigrants from Guatemala
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Immigrants from Guatemala Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,864,949 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,228,850 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Immigrants from Guatemala |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 30.3% | 26.6% |
| Range | 27.9% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 13.9% | 12.1% |
| Median | 12.5% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Guatemala by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Estonian (12.0%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Central America (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Danish (12.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Moroccan (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Ghanaian (12.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |
| Syrians | 76.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
| Ghanaians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.1% |
| Moroccans | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.1% |
| Danes | 72.5 /100 | #157 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |