Pueblo vs Potawatomi Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pueblo
Potawatomi
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pueblo
Potawatomi
4.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Potawatomi Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,073,989 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,395 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 12.1%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pueblo | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 0.85% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 23.2% | 18.6% |
Range | 22.4% | 18.1% |
Mean | 7.4% | 6.4% |
Median | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo and Potawatomi by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Lumbee (4.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (4.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Apache (4.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |