New Zealander vs South African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
South African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
South Africans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs South African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,904,660 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,561,768 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.65%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | South African |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 17.7% | 27.3% |
| Range | 16.2% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 7.3% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and South Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |