Liberian vs Ghanaian Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Liberian
Ghanaian
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Liberians
Ghanaians
18.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Ghanaian Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,084,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,691,747 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 10.6% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 34.1% | 32.2% |
Range | 23.5% | 25.7% |
Mean | 18.4% | 16.7% |
Median | 18.1% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Ghanaians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Bangladeshi (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Creek (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Barbadian (18.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Kenya (18.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |