Israeli vs Sri Lankan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Israeli
Sri Lankan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Israelis
Sri Lankans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs Sri Lankan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,116,012 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,321,822 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.040%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.023% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 20.4% |
| Range | 14.3% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis and Sri Lankans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |