Inupiat vs Sri Lankan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Sri Lankan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Sri Lankans
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Sri Lankan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,321,822 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.93%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 20.4% |
| Range | 16.9% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Sri Lankans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |