Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Okinawan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Okinawan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Okinawans
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Okinawan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,734,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Okinawan |
Minimum | 0.94% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 10.6% |
Range | 12.1% | 8.7% |
Mean | 5.2% | 4.9% |
Median | 5.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Okinawans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |