Immigrants from Scotland vs Central American Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Central American
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Central Americans
12.0%
FEMALE DISABILITY
79.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Central American Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,394,283 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,442,047 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Central American |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 36.4% | 21.1% |
| Range | 32.6% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 10.8% |
| Median | 11.9% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Central Americans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Sudanese (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (12.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (12.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Greek (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Kenya (12.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Ugandan (11.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Kenyan (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Ecuadorian (11.9%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Kenyans | 94.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 94.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 83.1 /100 | #148 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Greeks | 82.0 /100 | #149 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 81.4 /100 | #150 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Icelanders | 80.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 79.3 /100 | #152 | Good 12.0% |
| Sudanese | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.0% |