Immigrants from Nepal vs Jamaican Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Jamaican
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Jamaicans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Jamaican Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,754,465 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,784,846 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.58% |
| Maximum | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Range | 6.1% | 5.0% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.63% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 0.80% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 0.80% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Jamaicans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and South American (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |