Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Nepal Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Nepal
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Nepal
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Nepal Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,141,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,780,675 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.77%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Immigrants from Nepal |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 54.8% | 24.4% |
| Range | 52.9% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 11.4% |
| Median | 10.6% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Nepal by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |