Immigrants from Denmark vs Pakistani Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Pakistani
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Pakistanis
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
16.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
11.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Pakistani Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,425,612 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,217,185 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.98%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 14.1% |
| Range | 12.0% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 4.4% |
| Median | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Pakistanis by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |