Immigrants from Australia vs Laotian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Laotian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Laotians
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Laotian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,815,117 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Laotian |
| Minimum | 0.16% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 7.1% |
| Range | 12.6% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.88% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Laotians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.89%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |